Private schools are much more expensive than public schools since public schools are paid by other people's taxes. Many will struggle because of money more if there aren't any public schools. We shoul have a diveraity of school so we xoukd all have a choice, Imagine if the governmant had to pay the bills of all the schools, Thats a lot, Too much money, Rise on taxes and much more problems thats why my opinion is no no no no no.
I do not think education is private good. Education is about creating public value and culture. Education is also the fundamental rights and have impact on realizing other rights. It is commitment of state to ensure basic education. Privately owned I would prefer to say privately owned schools rather than private schools are more interested towards profit making rather than ensuring fundamental rights of education. Therefore, education as a public good should be publicly managed.
I was born here, however I still come from a family of immigrants. By privatizing schools how am I going to pay for school? Or will the rich be the only ones who will go to school? Rich kids who on average probably score lower than me academically at any subject. I can say that with confidence having a perfect transcript. There are some advantages of privates schools such as small class size, better scores ; however, they're no better than public schools.
The problems with private schools are: the hunger for money, staff does not need full credentials, don't follow federal standards, and are too lenient on bullies.
In addition, students will start to develop a attitude like everything is entitled to them. I don't think all schools should be private and parents should have the choice to choose. In my opinion, I think all schools should not be private. There are three reasons based on my opinions. The first reason is that private schools need to spend more money than public schools. Now, there are many families that cannot support their children to the private school. According to this reason it can bring up the problem and that will be the next reason.
If all schools were public, he says, everyone—including wealthier families—would be responsible for every school, so more people would step up to address any problems in those institutions than they do in the real world. School boards and after-school enrichment programs, for example, would have more volunteers; campus-improvement efforts and textbook upgrades would get more funding. But this concept could be more of an ideal than it would be a realistic result.
Pioneer High suffers from a wide racial-achievement gap. According to recent research by Sean F. And even in the most rigorous public schools, money can easily distinguish educational outcomes: Well-resourced kids who have access to private tutoring or college-prep services, who can study instead of work part-time, who get to take private dance or language lessons to enhance their worldview unsurprisingly tend to fare better than do kids who are less fortunate.
Segregation exists even in ostensibly integrated schools, where whites are disproportionately enrolled in AP and honors classes. Assuming the schools in an all-public world were funded as they are now—with a mix of federal, state, and local sources—the quality of education children receive would largely be based on where they live. Wealthier families tend to buy homes in more expensive areas where the steep taxes result in greater school funding—and are often correlated with higher-quality schools.
This suggests that in an all-public-school world, those with means would likely buy real estate in well-resourced districts—removing their resources from needier school communities and diluting from those poorer areas the pool of high achievers who experts say can benefit lower-performing students.
Wealthy people might even try to secede from poorly resourced areas and create their own districts. The victims of this phenomenon are often systems like Lincoln Consolidated Schools in Ypsilanti, Michigan, a lower-income area 20 minutes from Ann Arbor. Only 28 percent of the students at Lincoln Senior High School, roughly a third of whom are African American and approximately 59 percent of whom are white, will attend a four-year college after graduation, according to state data.
This is a common phenomenon. When a breakup forced her and her children to leave Ypsilanti, she decided to move to Saline, a city near Ann Arbor with a reputation for good schools: 72 percent of students at Saline High, where the vast majority of kids are white, attend a four-year college after graduation.
In fact, her daughter told her she was learning things in her Saline classes that she had already learned the year before at Lincoln. In Ypsilanti, that perception became the reality, with school segregation putting its already-disadvantaged youth at a further disadvantage. An all-public world could also put unconventional learners at a dramatic disadvantage. Parents say specialty schools are crucial for responding to the needs of students not well served by traditional public schools—from those with learning disabilities to those who are extremely talented.
Peter Margules decided to send his son, now 8, to Steppingstone School in Farmington Hills, Michigan, a school for academically exceptional students, after the child was discovered to have an IQ score that was two standard deviations above gifted.
In a similar vein, Andrea Allan, who lives in New York City, pulled her year-old son out of public school after third grade. She had him tested and found out he had mild dyslexia and some language-based neurological differences that affect his learning style.
So, she enrolled him in the Stephen Gaynor School, geared toward bright students with language-based learning differences. The school has a very low student-to-teacher ratio and a customized learning plan for each child.
Today, school choice has become a polarizing term, pitting those who favor market-based approaches to education against those who say such approaches undermine public schools and the children they serve. But imagining a world with only private schools or with only public ones reveals just how easy it is to overlook a simple truth: These are not mutually exclusive aims.
Just as liberty in America means citizens have the freedom to choose for themselves, that power comes with a responsibility to the public good. A school is more than just a school.
Ultimately, it is a foundation for the future and a reflection of societal values. Absolutely not. There would be many bad things going on. A roiling free market is innovative and creative, but it also creates disturbances. There would be problems that we can't foresee. Should we not only shut down all the public schools, but also prevent the government from having any education policy? This isn't a policy proposal. It's a thought experiment. One of the biggest problems of human imagination is status quo bias.
Just because we have some stuff around us, we can't think of another way to arrange it. And because of this status quo bias, our debates about the future become impossibly cramped. Education is definitely a victim of this. A lot of people imagine that without public school, children would be left to play in traffic or huff glue, and nobody would ever get educated, except for the children of robber barons.
But if you take the time to actually think it through, you realize that it would be a different world. Skip to header Skip to main content Skip to footer Opinion. What would happen? I'm serious — let's game this out. But what would happen next? What about the middle class? I leave the policy implications as an exercise for the reader. But first, take the red pill. There are also personal priorities related to faith and culture. For some parents, the cost of public school vs private school is secondary to the perceived advantages of faith-based education.
These questions have arguably never been harder to answer. When it comes to the old public vs. According to data found in , the percentage of new teachers less than four years of teaching experience is higher in private schools at 16 percent, compared with public schools at 11 percent. Also, more public school teachers participate in some form of professional development every year than private school teachers do, and public school teachers are paid more, on average, than private school teachers.
The disparity between class sizes is a huge consideration for parents debating between public and private schools. The average class size is 25 kids, compared to 19 kids per class in private schools according to NCES. Correspondingly, private schools have a better student-to-teacher ratio of
0コメント